Endangered Animals

endanger Animals Humans be destructive. Not a lot of us think ab show up how what we do affects the world around us. We al close act like we argon the nevertheless aces on this planet. We go around polluting and destroying our world with no regard for our actions. The things that experience out in the wild argon paying the price for it. Every day that passes on that point is an early(a) animal or found that is placed on an jeopardize list. This is happening at an alarming rate.Because of mans desire to expand and conquer their surroundings, there argon animals and plants that atomic number 18 on the brink of deadion that get out not be around for our kids and future generations to enjoy if aboutthing is not done about it straightaway. This problem has been going on for hundreds of years. there are animals and plants that can precisely been seen in paintings or early photography. It is because of our early ancestors that we run through this problem nowadays and we co nsent to do more than to prevent more animals and plants from disappearing forever. So what is an be species? What is an extinct species?What has happened to cause them to obtain endangered or extinct? What conducts to be done in order to merely the endangered species from becoming extinct? Can anything be done to save them? The answer to most of these questions is not known by every(prenominal)one. With all told the attention that this defeat gets from the government or groups that weightlift for the environment, it gets the kindred amount of disregard from the public. Many people want to help or donate hardly very just about of those actually follow through. This is a very important electric rayject that needs to be taken serious by the public.It needs their full attention because they are the ones that can truly agnise a change. People reallyly dont understand the concept of extinction. If aroundthing becomes extinct, there is no coming back, no limit button. It is gone forever. So it is dictatorial that things are done to prevent more animals and plants from disappearing. The best thing to happen as of and to advocate for preservation of our dispositions splendiferous things is The Endangered Species motion. First enacted in 1973, the Endangered Species figure is one of the most critical laws that take in been put in place to protect our environment and the organisms that detain in it.It protects more than the menace and endangered animals, in fact. When restrictions are placed on certain activities because of their potential to affect terrorened or endangered organisms, those same restrictions serve to a gradation to protect the non-threatened, non-endangered organisms that live in association with them. Entire ecosystems are often protected. Some, however, are more critical of the Endangered Species Act than they are complimentary. They contend it should all be abolished or greatly paired down. Supporters of the Act, in turn , often show that the Act should be strengthened.The intent of this paper is to seek both sides of this argument and to purify and reach a conclusion as to exactly what should happen to the Endangered Species Act. The goodness of the Endangered Species Act is hard to argue. The US search and Wild brio Service Reports (2009) that twenty-two species that are at one time listed as endangered gain now been taken off the list as they are no lengthy endangered. Only two species that were ever put on the list prior to their actual extinction hold now become extinct (US fish and Wildlife Service, 2009).Additionally, twenty-three other species that were once classified as endangered have now recovered to the point that they are considered threatened, a less(prenominal) critical status (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009). Less encouraging, however, is that far too many species actually go extinct while they are being considered for listing (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009). Ironica lly, many critics of the Endangered Species Act argue that the fact that key animals have recovered completelyifies abolishing the Act in its entiretyConversely, it is argued by proponents of the Endangered Species Act that the need for the Endangered Species Act obviously does not end when any one animal is taken off the list. Consider, for example, the case history of the grey-headedness skirt chaser down (Canis lupus). The gray wildcat is not only one of the most impressive of the large North American mammals it is also one of the most misunderstood. The history of the gray wolf since the arrival of the European peoples who every which way displaced both indigenous gentleman populations and indigenous animal and plant populations has been interlaced with attempts at extermination and, more recently, conservation.The species was almost trim back to the point of extinction ahead public sentiment would sway to the point where it would receive any(prenominal) protective c overing. First listed as an endangered species in 1973, the gray wolf (thanks to the conservation efforts and severe effectual penalties for harming this species that are attribut subject to the Endangered Species Act) is one of the success stories of the Endangered Species Act. With the upswing in the gray wolf population, however, there has been a incidental increase once once more in the same public resentment which almost obliterated the gray wolf from the face of the earth just a few decades ago.This resentment, and the loss of home ground which seems to characterize so many indigenous species of the Americas, translate to a continuation of the rocky road which the gray wolf has travelled for so long. The plight of the gray wolf can be directly related to the fact that the wolf is considered a threat to man and livestock alike. Although wolf behavior makes them little threat to man the general, the public regards the wolf as a menace waiting in the woods to consume babies an d to slaughter livestock. plot of ground the former concern is preposterous, the latter(prenominal) does have some basis in fact.Indeed, wolves have been documented as preying on livestock. There are, however, reasons behind the changes we are noting in the gray wolfs traditional prey regime. Current management efforts for the gray wolf must, in fact, address the many changes confronting the wolf today. These changes include the contact of humans, seismic disturbances such as habitat loss, the reduction of prey numbers, and the consequent increase of wolf to prey ratio. In many areas where the wolves innate(p) prey has decreased they have retreated to island like enclaves, some of which are in unfortunate association with livestock interests.In other cases, however, the wolves still enjoy some habitat that is protected in the name of other organisms that are still on the endangered species list. Proponents of the Endangered Species Act use the fact that the wolf population or a ny other delisted organisms populations could once again draw a downward spiral. The obvious conclusion is that the Endangered Species Act is anything but obsolete. It is just as needed today as it was when it was first implemented. Another putting green criticism on the Endangered Species Act is that too many organisms are listed.Many of the species on the Endangered Species list, for example, are wash. Critics of the Act argue that sub categorizing a species and identifying some of those categorizations as either threatened or endangered is unjust because the species as a whole is doing just fine. Ecologically, however, raceway are important. It is important to remember when considering subspecies that they sometimes occupy a completely different ecological niche than do other members of their species.Furthermore, they are unique decent physiologically that that uniqueness itself justifies the added protection being include on the endangered or threatened list provides. Anothe r argument that is lodged against the Endangered Species Act is that some of the species have no real value in todays world. Some, in fact, are commonly looked on with disdain by many. Consider, for example, the plight of bats, several of which like the indium Bat are included on the endangered species list.These bats have not only endured significant threats in the past, they are currently dealing with yet some other threat. That threat is a disease called tweed-nosed syndrome, a disease that currently is affecting a potentially serious number of bats in the northeast United States and possibly in Canada and even Europe. any thousands of bats have already died and others are sure to suffer a similar fate. The US geologic Surveys field Wildlife Health Center estimates that as of August 30, 2008 some 100,000 have died in the northeastern US in association with this dim condition.Some estimates of bat mortality associated with white nose syndrome, however, are considerably higher . Cohn (2009), for example, estimates that some 500,000 bats have died in just the last two winters alone. Cohn (2009) reveals that some populations have been reduced by 90 percent. To understand the full impact that white nose syndrome might have one needs to consider not just how the disease is impacting bats but also how decreased bat populations could impact other aspects of our world.Bats are one of the primary natural controls of insects that we have. One estimate is that the tally number of bats that have already died in association with white nose syndrome leave result in a minimum of 2. 4 trillion pounds of insects not being consumed by those bats (The Economist, 2008). As one article summarizes, the impacts will extend beyond an itchy evening in the garden. Without bats, farmers may have to use more insecticide, ski tow environmental worries and pushing up grocery prices (The Economist, 2008, 49). Another considerations is that if we llow bat populations to continuall y flounder then potentially dangerous insects will undoubtedly increase in numbers. Many of these insects carry diseases like encephalitis and malaria, diseases that directly impact human beings. In addition to their importance in absolute insect populations, bats are an integral component of their ecosystem in other respects. Many invertebrates and microbes depend on them in one respect or another in their own life cycles. Consider, for example, the importance of guano deposits in the cave ecosystem.Without those deposits countless number of other organisms would be deprived the habitat they need to survive. Those organisms, in turn, are eaten by other organisms. The impact caused by depletions in their numbers could reverberate all through the ecosystem. So too could the impact of not listing a species like bats on the endangered species list because of perceptions about their value as an organism We are, in fact, fortunate as a coun hear because we have the resources to sub categ orize our natural world and to delve into the subtle ecological distinctions that sometimes characterize it.Poorer countries are not that fortunate and one result is that subspecies are not typically found on their lists of threatened and endangered species despite the fact that subspecies are an important ecological element there (Birders World, 2010). Neither are some of the species that are perceived as less important or desirable. Birders World (2010) cautions that there is a fine line amongst too much sub categorization and too little because formation too many taxes can create excessive administrative costs and bring down conservation dollars . . But defining too few taxes can hinder the effective conservation of imperiled biodiversity (11). Having considered both sides of the argument surrounding the Endangered Species Act, it seems logical to resolve that, despite the fact that they Endangered Species Act could stand some improvement in terms of the speed of the bureaucr acy that governs it, the Act itself is quite sufficient as is as long as it is administered to the full extent of its power.There is a growing tendency in government, however, to undermine the strength of the Endangered Species Act by make decisions on when and where to apply it a political matter rather than an ecological matter (Munro, 2010). To do this is to insure that ultimately it will not just be the environment and the wile organisms that live in it that will lose, it will be mankind as well.Endangered AnimalsEndangered animals are one of the most issues that are affecting the earth today. Endangered animals are any species of animals that is at significant risk of extinction due to the dramatic decline in its population and habitat destruction. The endangerment caused by poaching, global warming and human activities. All life on earth is part of a nature balanced, and all species are dependent on each other to maintain the planets ecosystem.Removing one species from the sy stem will have some effects.(Endangered species) claims that there is inconceivable calamity when species disappeared calamity that cannot expect it. This essay will discuss some information about endangered animals around the world. Trade of Animals The animals are becoming sort of trades in poor places around the world, where no topical anesthetic markets to deter the hunters. In addition, those animals could be a kind of luxury food in rich countries. That is to say illegal hunting refers to how it is important is the money today even if at the expense of animals.Duffy writes that The size of even legal international wildlife trade is staggering worth approximately US$160 billion per year, it is one of the most valuable businesses in the world (Duffy, 2010, p. 17). Species Donnellan points out that Today there about 5,000 endangered animals and at least one species die out every year (Donnellan, 2000, p. 9). One of the most endangered animals is a Siberian tiger. There are only 200 Siberian tigers in the wild, and almost of them are in nature reserves. However, elephants go side by side with Siberian tigers.There are two species of elephant, the African elephant and the Asian elephant. Elephant is an amazing creature that can lives in all major habitats. Furthermore, elephant has an important role on their habitat. They allow the grassland to regenerate again by fall the trees. sure when they walk they create paths for other creatures and also body of water hole. Donnellan (2000) states that Care for the Wild International support elephant conservation by provides items like vehicles for many places in Africa. Causes of Endangerment Poaching The picture of poaching is complicated, because it covers a wide range of activities.Poaching actually is illegal hunting of any creatures, whether banned by every government in the earth of wildlife. Furthermore, Poaching take of us unique species of animals, such as elephants and tigers. In order, Duffy (2010) arg ues that the wildlife agencies faced many task of tackling poaching. For instance, conservation practice has been progressively to stop the poachers. Duffy provides information about poaching, In 1988 president Moi in Kenya gave authorization for the Kenya wildlife service to use a shoot-on-sight policy against suspected poachers (Duffy, 2010. p. 82). Global Warming EffectNational Geographic (2012) insists that the Global warming is a long term change effective the average of weather occurs to a particular region. Similarly, changes may happen due to human activities which include the combustion of fossil fuels in cars. With reference to emitted from cars that are the most dangerous types of gases that called by carbon dioxide. So what the impacts of the global warming have been on wildlife? Only increasing one degree could melt the ice which impress Arctic sea ice, ice sheets that cover Greenland and mountain glaciers where are habitats for many species of animals.National Geogra phic shows that Polar bear, Arctic wolf, Arctic fox and Seals are threatened now (National Geographic, 2012). Moreover, the increase of sea level laid the marine mammals in a serious situation that depend on the ice to survive. Solution Extinct is to be gone forever, so how to protect the endangered animals? Animal needs three essential things to live fresh air, pure water, food and place to live. People try to help endangered animals from extinction in many different ways.(Endangered species) notes that the Conversation Organisations work to aware people from the consequences of extinction. However, they scream to protect the animals habitat and building nature reserves. Also, captive breeding is another solution which is the breeding of animals in zoos to preserve endangered animals. So what we can do to help the endangered animals in the world. Certainly reduce the amount of paper could survive the habitats while all people know that the papers comes from trees. Conclusion The pl ant produces things that are important to save the human life.Conserve animals may lead to protect the plant where all of the humans live. Donnellan suggests that Roughly 99 percent of threatened species are at risk because of human activities alone (Donnellan, 2000, p. 63). Scientists try to reduce the influence of human activities as much as possible, and recover the habitats. Conservation Organisations present the solutions for the governments that protect endangered species from extinct while the governments able to Impose strict laws in the face of offenders.Endangered AnimalsEndangered Animals Humans are destructive. Not a lot of us think about how what we do affects the world around us. We almost act like we are the only ones on this planet. We go around polluting and destroying our world with no regard for our actions. The things that live out in the wild are paying the price for it. Every day that passes there is another animal or plant that is placed on an endangered list. This is happening at an alarming rate.Because of mans desire to expand and conquer their surroundings, there are animals and plants that are on the brink of extinction that will not be around for our kids and future generations to enjoy if something is not done about it now. This problem has been going on for hundreds of years. There are animals and plants that can only been seen in paintings or early photography. It is because of our early ancestors that we have this problem today and we have to do more to prevent more animals and plants from disappearing forever. So what is an endangered species? What is an extinct species?What has happened to cause them to become endangered or extinct? What needs to be done in order to save the endangered species from becoming extinct? Can anything be done to save them? The answer to most of these questions is not known by everyone. With all the attention that this subject gets from the government or groups that fight for the environment, it get s the same amount of disregard from the public. Many people want to help or donate but very few of those actually follow through. This is a very important subject that needs to be taken serious by the public.It needs their full attention because they are the ones that can truly make a change. People really dont understand the concept of extinction. If something becomes extinct, there is no coming back, no reset button. It is gone forever. So it is imperative that things are done to prevent more animals and plants from disappearing. The best thing to happen as of yet to advocate for preservation of our natures beautiful things is The Endangered Species Act. First enacted in 1973, the Endangered Species Act is one of the most critical laws that have been put in place to protect our environment and the organisms that live in it.It protects more than the threatened and endangered animals, in fact. When restrictions are placed on certain activities because of their potential to affect th reatened or endangered organisms, those same restrictions serve to a degree to protect the non-threatened, non-endangered organisms that live in association with them. Entire ecosystems are often protected. Some, however, are more critical of the Endangered Species Act than they are complimentary. They contend it should either be abolished or greatly paired down. Supporters of the Act, in turn, often argue that the Act should be strengthened.The intent of this paper is to explore both sides of this argument and to try and reach a conclusion as to exactly what should happen to the Endangered Species Act. The effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act is hard to argue. The US Fish and Wildlife Service Reports (2009) that twenty-two species that are at one time listed as endangered have now been taken off the list as they are no longer endangered. Only two species that were ever put on the list prior to their actual extinction have now become extinct (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 200 9).Additionally, twenty-three other species that were once classified as endangered have now recovered to the point that they are considered threatened, a less critical status (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009). Less encouraging, however, is that far too many species actually go extinct while they are being considered for listing (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009). Ironically, many critics of the Endangered Species Act argue that the fact that key animals have recovered justifies abolishing the Act in its entiretyConversely, it is argued by proponents of the Endangered Species Act that the need for the Endangered Species Act obviously does not end when any one animal is taken off the list. Consider, for example, the case history of the gray wolf (Canis lupus). The gray wolf is not only one of the most impressive of the large North American mammals it is also one of the most misunderstood. The history of the gray wolf since the arrival of the European peoples who indiscriminately displaced both indigenous human populations and indigenous animal and plant populations has been interlaced with attempts at extermination and, more recently, conservation.The species was almost reduced to the point of extinction before public sentiment would sway to the point where it would receive some protection. First listed as an endangered species in 1973, the gray wolf (thanks to the conservation efforts and severe legal penalties for harming this species that are attributable to the Endangered Species Act) is one of the success stories of the Endangered Species Act. With the upswing in the gray wolf population, however, there has been a consequent increase once again in the same public resentment which almost obliterated the gray wolf from the face of the earth just a few decades ago.This resentment, and the loss of habitat which seems to characterize so many indigenous species of the Americas, translate to a continuation of the rocky road which the gray wolf has traveled f or so long. The plight of the gray wolf can be directly related to the fact that the wolf is considered a threat to man and livestock alike. Although wolf behavior makes them little threat to man the general, the public regards the wolf as a menace waiting in the woods to consume babies and to slaughter livestock. While the former concern is preposterous, the latter does have some basis in fact.Indeed, wolves have been documented as preying on livestock. There are, however, reasons behind the changes we are noting in the gray wolfs traditional prey regime. Current management efforts for the gray wolf must, in fact, address the many changes confronting the wolf today. These changes include the impact of humans, impacts such as habitat loss, the reduction of prey numbers, and the consequent increase of wolf to prey ratio. In many areas where the wolves natural prey has decreased they have retreated to island like enclaves, some of which are in unfortunate association with livestock in terests.In other cases, however, the wolves still enjoy some habitat that is protected in the name of other organisms that are still on the endangered species list. Proponents of the Endangered Species Act use the fact that the wolf population or any other delisted organisms populations could once again begin a downward spiral. The obvious conclusion is that the Endangered Species Act is anything but obsolete. It is just as needed today as it was when it was first implemented. Another common criticism on the Endangered Species Act is that too many organisms are listed.Many of the species on the Endangered Species list, for example, are subspecies. Critics of the Act argue that sub categorizing a species and identifying some of those categorizations as either threatened or endangered is unjust because the species as a whole is doing just fine. Ecologically, however, subspecies are important. It is important to remember when considering subspecies that they sometimes occupy a complete ly different ecological niche than do other members of their species.Furthermore, they are unique enough physiologically that that uniqueness itself justifies the added protection being included on the endangered or threatened list provides. Another argument that is lodged against the Endangered Species Act is that some of the species have no real value in todays world. Some, in fact, are commonly looked on with disdain by many. Consider, for example, the plight of bats, several of which like the Indiana Bat are included on the endangered species list.These bats have not only endured significant threats in the past, they are currently dealing with yet another threat. That threat is a disease called white-nosed syndrome, a disease that currently is affecting a potentially serious number of bats in the northeastern United States and possibly in Canada and even Europe. any thousands of bats have already died and others are sure to suffer a similar fate. The US Geological Surveys Nation al Wildlife Health Center estimates that as of August 30, 2008 some 100,000 have died in the northeastern US in association with this mysterious condition.Some estimates of bat mortality associated with white nose syndrome, however, are considerably higher. Cohn (2009), for example, estimates that some 500,000 bats have died in just the last two winters alone. Cohn (2009) reveals that some populations have been reduced by ninety percent. To understand the full impact that white nose syndrome might have one needs to consider not just how the disease is impacting bats but also how decreased bat populations could impact other aspects of our world.Bats are one of the primary natural controls of insects that we have. One estimate is that the total number of bats that have already died in association with white nose syndrome will result in a minimum of 2. 4 million pounds of insects not being consumed by those bats (The Economist, 2008). As one article summarizes, the impacts will extend beyond an itchy evening in the garden. Without bats, farmers may have to use more insecticide, raising environmental worries and pushing up grocery prices (The Economist, 2008, 49). Another considerations is that if we llow bat populations to continually flounder then potentially dangerous insects will undoubtedly increase in numbers. Many of these insects carry diseases like encephalitis and malaria, diseases that directly impact human beings. In addition to their importance in controlling insect populations, bats are an integral component of their ecosystem in other respects. Many invertebrates and microbes depend on them in one respect or another in their own life cycles. Consider, for example, the importance of guano deposits in the cave ecosystem.Without those deposits countless number of other organisms would be deprived the habitat they need to survive. Those organisms, in turn, are eaten by other organisms. The impact caused by depletions in their numbers could reverberate a ll through the ecosystem. So too could the impact of not listing a species like bats on the endangered species list because of perceptions about their value as an organism We are, in fact, fortunate as a country because we have the resources to sub categorize our natural world and to delve into the subtle ecological distinctions that sometimes characterize it.Poorer countries are not that fortunate and one result is that subspecies are not typically found on their lists of threatened and endangered species despite the fact that subspecies are an important ecological element there (Birders World, 2010). Neither are some of the species that are perceived as less important or desirable. Birders World (2010) cautions that there is a fine line between too much sub categorization and too little because defining too many taxes can create excessive administrative costs and dilute conservation dollars . . But defining too few taxes can hinder the effective conservation of imperiled biodivers ity (11). Having considered both sides of the argument surrounding the Endangered Species Act, it seems logical to conclude that, despite the fact that they Endangered Species Act could stand some improvement in terms of the speed of the bureaucracy that governs it, the Act itself is quite sufficient as is as long as it is administered to the full extent of its power.There is a growing tendency in government, however, to undermine the strength of the Endangered Species Act by making decisions on when and where to apply it a political matter rather than an ecological matter (Munro, 2010). To do this is to insure that ultimately it will not just be the environment and the wile organisms that live in it that will lose, it will be mankind as well.